- Introduction
- The basics of reaction time
- Different types of reaction time in sports
- The physiological factors of reaction time in sports
- The mental and environmental factors of reaction time in sports
- Benefits of reaction time in sports
- Here’s how you train for faster reaction time
- Final thoughts
- Sources
- Complex reaction time: the time it takes to respond to the correct stimulus out of many stimuli.
- Hick's law: the more information the brain has to process, the longer the reaction time is.
- Simple reaction time: the time it takes to process and react to a single stimulus.
Introduction
Reaction time describes the time interval between an external signal and your reaction to it. Unlike reflexes, where the information goes straight to a muscle from the spinal cord and does not involve the brain, reactions need to be processed first. Thus, your brain decides whether the stimulus is important enough to respond to – and how to do it most efficiently.
Reaction time is dependent on three main factors;
Perception
Processing
Response
Your reaction time is a result of these three components working together. If one of them is hindered, your reaction time will suffer as a result. Bear in mind that since reaction time requires a physical response from your muscles, it is not the same as processing speed (how fast you can detect a signal). That is why fast reaction time is often associated with good reflexes.
This post explains the basic mechanisms of reaction time, and what makes it such a crucial component in athletic performance.
The basics of reaction time
In a sports context, a stimulus can be either visual (seeing), auditory (hearing) or tactile (touch) depending on the activity. Once the signal is perceived through the sensory system (part of the nervous system responsible for processing sensory information), your brain quickly processes the information and responds by sending a message down the spinal cord to the right muscles. Thus, creating a physical response.
The time it takes to respond to the stimulus is dependent on the complexity, type (seeing, hearing, etc.) and the strength of the stimulus. That is also why reaction time can be divided into simple reaction time, recognition reaction time, and choice reaction time.
Type
Description
Simple reaction time
A single response to a single stimulus. For example, reacting to a starting pistol during a 100m sprint is a simple reaction time task.
Recognition reaction time
Several stimuli with one correct response. For example, only reacting to a starting pistol out of many auditory stimuli (whistle, horn, voice, etc.) is a recognition reaction task.
Choice reaction time
(complex reaction time or compound reaction time)
Multiple stimuli with differing responses to each stimuli. For example, having multiple auditory stimuli (starting pistol, whistle, horn, voice, etc.), each determining which direction you sprint.
Simple reaction time produces the fastest response of the three (around 0.13-0.18s), whereas choice reaction time takes the longest. This is due to the fact that the more information your brain has to process, the longer it takes to respond (Hick’s law).
Although it is unlikely that you can improve processing speed with practice, there are several things you can do to maintain and improve your reaction time. For example, learning to anticipate where the stimulus might occur, being well-rested and alert, reducing in-game distractions, and keeping your mind sharp with cognitive exercises can help your brain process information better.
Share this post
Reaction Time
Your ability to perceive, process & respond to a stimulusRelies on the input from the sensory systemThe more information the brain has to process, the slower the response isAffected by genetics, alertness, IQ, experience, complexity & strength of the stimulus, etc.
The sensory system
The sensory system is a part of the nervous system responsible for processing sensory information. These systems include the visual (seeing), auditory (hearing), gustatory (taste), olfactory (smell), somatosensory (touch, pain, temperature, proprioception), and vestibular (balance, spatial awareness) systems.
The main role of sensory systems is converting information into neural signals that can be interpreted by the nervous system. Although most of these signals come from external sources from your environment, some sensory systems detect internal stimuli. For example, proprioceptors (Golgi tendon organs, muscle spindles, etc.) in the muscles and tendons detect information about muscle length and limb position.
After receiving an appropriate stimulus, the information is transmitted from the sensory organ to the spinal cord and then the brain. The only exception is the visual system, which transmits the information directly to the brain. This information is then sent to different parts of the brain for further processing, which allows for more accurate understanding of the location and urgency of the stimulus – and whether it requires a response.
The physiological factors of reaction time in sports
There are several factors that can affect your reaction time. These include genetics, sex, age, and even body temperature. All of these factors have their own impact on how fast your reaction time is and how well you can improve it.
Genetics and reaction time go hand in hand. Unfortunately, reaction time can only be improved around 10-20% outside of these biological factors. This is due to the fact that reaction time is hardwired into our bodies through nerves and therefore impossible to improve.
Sex and age can have a small effect on reaction time. On average, both sexes tend to have a similar muscle contraction time. However, motor responses in males are comparatively stronger than females. Thus, resulting in faster reaction times for both auditory and visual stimuli. Both sexes also show a similar age-related decline in reaction time. Some studies have indicated that the brain’s response time starts steadily declining at a rate of ~4-10ms/year after the age of 24.
Some studies have also found that the optimal reaction time occurs at higher body temperatures. Furthermore, as the body temperature cools down, your reaction time will become longer as a result.
The mental and environmental factors of reaction time in sports
There are also several environmental and mental factors that can affect your reaction time in sports. These include; the strength and complexity of the stimulus, environmental distractions, alertness and fatigue, anticipation and experience, as well as some cognitive abilities.
The strength and complexity of the stimulus are two of the most important factors in reaction time. This is because simple stimuli do not need the same processing power as more complex stimuli. Additionally, even the type of stimulus has an impact on how fast the reaction is – visual stimuli producing the fastest responses, followed by auditory (hearing) stimuli. This also means that any environmental distractions like whistles, chants, opposing players, or poor visibility can significantly hinder your ability to receive and process information and delay your reaction time.
”Your experience will help you anticipate when and where the stimulus might occur.”
Alertness and fatigue also have a strong effect on reaction time. One theory for this is that fatigue (sleep deprivation, etc.) increases reaction time due to the body’s competing needs – a simultaneous need to sleep, stay awake, and perform tasks. Thus resulting in cognitive impairment (difficulties remembering, learning new things, concentrating, or making decisions). Interestingly, some cognitive abilities such as higher IQ have been linked to faster reaction times in some studies. However, the actual mechanism for this is still unclear. One theory is that individuals with higher IQ may show better focus and attention or have more effective information processing in the brain.
Training background can also have a big effect on reaction time in sports. On average, simple reaction time is between 0.16s to 0.2s among most people. However, top-tier athletes have shown reaction times as low as 0.15s. Experience also provides you with a better understanding of when and where a stimulus might occur. Therefore, you will be able to anticipate a situation even before it happens.
Quicker decision making can slow down the game around you.
Training for faster reaction time
Reaction time can be improved by 10-20% outside of genetic factors. The most effective reaction time training methods are cognitive exercises, physical exercises, and video games.
Cognitive exercises are by far the most effective methods to improve reaction time. This means using specifically designed exercises that aim to improve your brain’s neural networks. As a result, your brain creates stronger and healthier connections, providing quicker responses with less mental effort. Thus, improving skills like memory, attention, problem solving and reaction time. The most well-known “brain exercises” include various card games, crossword puzzles, jigsaw puzzles, chess, sudokus, and math problems. Even learning a new language or playing a new instrument are linked to better cognitive ability. Lastly, different mindfulness exercises can help you relax and increase awareness for better reaction time.
Physical exercises can also be combined with various reaction time challenges. For example, you can perform plyometric exercises or sprints by responding to a specific stimulus (whistle, etc.). Additionally, different hand-eye-coordination exercises, trail running, and reaction ball training have shown good results in improving reaction time. More modern methods such reaction light systems and strobe glasses also show great promise in improving and maintaining reaction time. However, these still need further research.
Fast-paced video games seem to have a significant connection to better cognitive abilities. This is because most video games challenge you to identify and select relevant visual information, and producing quick motor responses to changing situations. Fast-paced video games also decrease attentional blink (ability to identify visual stimuli in quick succession) and prevent processing of irrelevant information.
Benefits of reaction time in sports
Reaction time can have an enormous effect on your athletic performance as well as your overall wellness. This is especially apparent among the older population where lower reaction time can lead to falling or slipping, which can cause severe debilitating injuries.
In a sports context, reaction time can help you react to each situation better and reduce injury risk – including concussions. It can also be a significant contributor to success in several sports. For example, in badminton (the fastest racket sport in the world) elite players are able to smash the shuttlecock at 418kmh/253.33mph. In tennis, the average first serve is around 185kmh/115mph
Benefit
Description
Accident prevention
Being able to quickly respond to changes in your environment can significantly reduce accidents and injuries. For example, dodging a moose on the road, regaining balance after slipping, etc.
Concussion prevention
Peripheral awareness and improved field of play can reduce risk of concussions. This is often sport-specific with some sports benefiting more than others.
Better performance
Better hand-eye coordination, faster reaction and more efficient processing can also slow the game around you.
Agility
Faster physical response to a stimulus can help you move quicker according to a stimulus. For example, being the first on the ball in football.
In a way, quicker decision making can slow down the game around you and help you maintain balance in sudden situations. It may even help you read your opponent’s bodily cues to instinctively make the right move at the right time.
The faster your reaction time is, the more time you have to process what happens on the field - and make the right decision.
Final thoughts
Quick reaction time is not only crucial for athletic performance but your overall wellness as well. Being able to quickly adjust to suddenly changing situations can have a tremendous impact on your overall health. Avoiding these issues and possible injuries can help maintain a healthy life and avoid surprising healthcare costs at the same time.
As far as athletic performance goes, fast reaction time can have an hugely beneficial effect in sports that require short spurts and quick thinking. This includes a huge variety of esports, court-based sports, field sports, motorsports as well as track sports.
Remember, consistently training each fitness component is not enough to improve your progression. You must maintain a balance between training, nutrition, and sufficient rest. Only then you can expect good results from your training program.
Did you learn anything new about reaction time in sports? Let us know in the comments.
Sources
- Adam, J.J., Paas, F.G., Buekers, M.J., Wuyts, I.J., Spijkers, W.A. & Wallmeyer, P. (1999) Gender differences in choice reaction time: Evidence for differential strategies. Ergonomics. Volume 42, Issue (2). pp.327-335.
- Balakrishnan G, Uppinakudru G, Girwar Singh G, Bangera S, Dutt Raghavendra A, Thangavel D. A comparative study on visual choice reaction time for different colors in females. Neurol Res Int. 2014;2014:301473. doi: 10.1155/2014/301473. Epub 2014 Dec 16. PMID: 25580294; PMCID: PMC4280496.
- Commodari, E. & Guarnera, M. (2008). Attention and aging. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research. Volume 20, Issue (6). pp.578–584.
- Deary I. J., Johnson W., Starr J. M. (2010). Are processing speed tasks biomarkers of cognitive aging? Psychology of Aging. Volume 25, Issue (1) pp.219-228.
- Deary I. J. & Der ,G. (2005). Reaction time, age, and cognitive ability: longitudinal findings from age 16 to 63 years in representative population samples. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition. Volume 12, Issue (2). pp.187-215.
- Deary I. J., Der, G. & Ford G. (2001). Reaction times and intelligence differences: a population-based cohort study. Intelligence. Volume 29, Issue (5). pp.389-399.
- Deary, I.J., Liewald, D. & Nissan, J. (2011). A free, easy-to-use, computer-based simple and four-choice reaction time programme: The Deary-Liewald reaction time task. Behaviour Research Methods. Volume 43, Issue (1) pp.258-268.
- Der G., Deary I. J. (2006). Age and sex differences in reaction time in adulthood: results from the United Kingdom Health and Lifestyle Survey. Psychology and Aging. Volume 21, Issue (1). pp.62-73.
- Donders, F.C. (1969) On the speed of mental processes. Acta Psychology. Volume 30, Issue (4). pp.412-431.
- Dykiert, D., Der, G., Starr, J. M. & Deary, I. J. (2012a). Age differences in intra-individual variability in simple and choice reaction time: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. Volume 7, Issue (10). e45759.
- Dykiert, D., Der G., Starr, J. M. & Deary, I. J. (2012b). Sex differences in reaction time mean and intraindividual variability across the life span. Developmental Psychology. Volume 48, Issue (5). pp.1262-1276.
- Etnier, J.L., Walter, S., Landers, D.M., Petruzzelo, S.J., Han, M. & Nowell, P. (1997) The influence of physical fitness and exercise upon cognitive functioning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. Volume 19, Issue (3). pp.249–77.
- Era, P., Sainio, P., Koskinen, S., Ohlgren, J., Harkanen, T. & Aromaa, A. (2011). Psychomotor speed in a random sample of 7979 subjects aged 30 years and over. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research. Volume 23, Issue (2) pp.135-144.
- Inui, N. (1997). Simple reaction times and timing of serial reactions of middle-aged and old men. Perceptual and Motor Skills. Volume 84, Issue (1). pp.219-225.
- Silverman, I. W. (2006). Sex differences in simple visual reaction time: a historical meta-analysis. Sex Roles. Volume 54, Issue (1-2) pp.58-68.
- Jain, Aditya et al. (2015) A comparative study of visual and auditory reaction times on the basis of gender and physical activity levels of medical first year students. International journal of applied & basic medical research. Volume 5, Issue (2), pp.124-127.
- Kemp, B.J. (1973) Reaction time of young and elderly subjects in relation to perceptual deprivation and signal-on versus signal-off condition. Developmental Psychology. Volume 8, Issue (2) pp.268-722.
- Kosinski, Robert J. 2005. A Literature Review of Reaction Time. Cited on 20.9.2019.
- Nakamoto, H. & Mori, S. (2008) Sport-specific decision-making in a Go/NoGo reaction task: Difference among nonathletes and baseball and basketball players. Perceptual and Motor Skills. Volume 106, Issue (1) pp.163-201.
- Pain, M.T. & Hibbs, A. (2007) Sprint starts and the minimum auditory reaction time. Journal of Sports Science. Volume 25, Issue (1). pp.79-86.
- Posner, M.I. (2005). Timing the brain: mental chronometry as a tool in neuroscience. PLoS Biology. Volume 3, Issue (2) e51.
- Posner, M.I. (1966) Components of skilled performance. Science. Volume 52, Issue (3730) pp.1712-1718.
- Shelton, J. & Kumar, G.P. (2010) Comparison between auditory and visual simple reaction times. Neuroscience & Medicine. Volume 1. pp.30-32.
- Thompson, J.J., Blair, M.R. & Henrey, A.J. (2014) Persistent Age-Related Cognitive-Motor Decline in Reaction Times in an Ecologically Valid Video Game Task Begins in Early Adulthood. PLoS ONE. Volume 9, Issue (4). e94215.
- Tønnessen, E., Haugen, T. & Shalfawi, S.A. (2013) Reaction time aspects of elite sprinters in athletic world championships. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. Volume 27, Issue (4). pp.885-892.
- Welford, A.T. (1980) Choice reaction time: Basic concepts. In: Welford AT, editor. Reaction Times. New York: Academic Press.
- Woods, D. L., Wyma, J. M., Yund, E. W., Herron, T. J., & Reed, B. (2015). Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time. Frontiers in human neuroscience. Volume 9, Issue (131). Published online 26 March 2015.
Join our growing list of subscribers!
Stay informed about the latest in sports science and physical performance. Subscribe to our mailing list for the latest updates, posts, products and much more.

Daniel Kiikka
Daniel Kiikka holds a Master’s Degree in sports science, with a focus on sports pedagogy. After graduating from the University of Jyväskylä in 2015, Daniel worked nearly a decade within the world-renowned Finnish educational system as a physical education and health science teacher. Since 2021, Daniel has worked as a Lecturer at the Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences.
Related Posts
October 7, 2021
The Spectrum of Teaching Styles: The Self-Check Style (d)
In the self-check style, the learner participates in both performing the task…
April 19, 2021
The Basics of Energy Production: The Citric Acid Cycle
The citric acid cycle is the second phase of cellular respiration. It creates 2…
August 30, 2019
Training For Speed And Better Athletic Performance
There's no way around it - training for speed is one of the most important…